hey brian, that'd be interesting :) can't wait to see?
now back to the tagboard drama, personally i feel it's okay for mr dot, or comma, or hyphen or any other aspiring punctuation marks to critic these designs -any designs for that matter, because we're all aspiring designers, and designers by right must at least be attentive to details in an artistic or tehnical sense sort of way, yeah? but you know what? it's immature and disrespectful (for the lack of better words) that instead of criticising in a constructive manner, a way that not only pulls other people to respect you and what you have to say but to ALSO take your critics as 'enlightenment', you crush these conceptual sketches without even delving/understanding the probable symbolism, character or meaning in their proposed designs. who exactly is the moron here?
i'm sure you're another design STUDENT, higher or lower semester than i, i don't give a rat's tail, but it's a little too early to be talking big especially when -assuming you're a taylor's student, you should've joined and prove to us just what you define a "design that does not suck." i mean, yeah sure you have your stand, you make something so genuinely simple so controversial which is fine, it makes the world go round, but the fact remains a conceptual sketch, as thomas said, has yet to be refined, so what's the point of being like that haughty chicken berkokok satu kampung before the egg even hatches?
i say don't get too excited just yet, just try and calm down. to begin with, it's not the end of the world let alone taylor's college that these sketches got pick. it makes your heart bleed, i understand, but why don't you strive to be the fullstop that you aspire to be and rest easy for a bit?
time heal all wounds, darling. and 23rd may is exactly the date we're waiting for.
pesonally i like the number three more than others...maybe cause its easy to see with the human scale there... the flip thing... with the openings... give much opportunity... on direct yet exploratiove way to guide people... number two is also nice... its more imagnative approach... very incoherent... like architecture itself... and the number four... the sketches is nice... idea of sculpture is also very good... such a cool way to create a booth in the manner of looking as a whole and to its detail.. number one and three.. i dont really feel the vibe and energy from it... sorry to say... but its like a negative way to present something positive... what is so stable and quiet in this modern world anyway... and why do we need to hide what we want to show off.. and maybe.. these two could revive their ideas to more contemporay sense... i think thats all from me folks.. good job lads.. peace and much love... woohoo!!
4 comments:
I hereby declare that LaCrest booth design changes the use of 'perspex' material to 'plastic sheets' and 'metal frames' instead. Thx.
hey brian, that'd be interesting :) can't wait to see?
now back to the tagboard drama, personally i feel it's okay for mr dot, or comma, or hyphen or any other aspiring punctuation marks to critic these designs -any designs for that matter, because we're all aspiring designers, and designers by right must at least be attentive to details in an artistic or tehnical sense sort of way, yeah? but you know what? it's immature and disrespectful (for the lack of better words) that instead of criticising in a constructive manner, a way that not only pulls other people to respect you and what you have to say but to ALSO take your critics as 'enlightenment', you crush these conceptual sketches without even delving/understanding the probable symbolism, character or meaning in their proposed designs. who exactly is the moron here?
i'm sure you're another design STUDENT, higher or lower semester than i, i don't give a rat's tail, but it's a little too early to be talking big especially when -assuming you're a taylor's student, you should've joined and prove to us just what you define a "design that does not suck." i mean, yeah sure you have your stand, you make something so genuinely simple so controversial which is fine, it makes the world go round, but the fact remains a conceptual sketch, as thomas said, has yet to be refined, so what's the point of being like that haughty chicken berkokok satu kampung before the egg even hatches?
i say don't get too excited just yet, just try and calm down. to begin with, it's not the end of the world let alone taylor's college that these sketches got pick. it makes your heart bleed, i understand, but why don't you strive to be the fullstop that you aspire to be and rest easy for a bit?
time heal all wounds, darling. and 23rd may is exactly the date we're waiting for.
pesonally i like the number three more than others...maybe cause its easy to see with the human scale there... the flip thing... with the openings... give much opportunity... on direct yet exploratiove way to guide people... number two is also nice... its more imagnative approach... very incoherent... like architecture itself... and the number four... the sketches is nice... idea of sculpture is also very good... such a cool way to create a booth in the manner of looking as a whole and to its detail.. number one and three.. i dont really feel the vibe and energy from it... sorry to say... but its like a negative way to present something positive... what is so stable and quiet in this modern world anyway... and why do we need to hide what we want to show off.. and maybe.. these two could revive their ideas to more contemporay sense... i think thats all from me folks.. good job lads.. peace and much love... woohoo!!
-napoleon
c'mon.. white and only white?
i dont see white in some..
Post a Comment